The individual, however, was affiliated with the OPCW as an engineer and apparently had access to materials gathered in the course of the Douma FFM, and based his/her conclusions on the same evidence pool. The "new leaked report" appears to be an engineering assessment carried out by one individual who, contrary to Sputnik's false claim, was never a member of the Fact-Finding Mission and is not currently employed by the organisation. Recurring disinformation narratives deflecting blame for chemical attacks from the Assad regime painting the White Helmets as cooperating with terrorists or terrorists themselves and aiming to discredit the OPCW. And today as the Syrian army is about to liquidate the terrorists, to finish with the precincts of Idlib, obviously the organisations that are against this are advancing their outdated narrative saying: “the Syrian government uses chemical weapons, so you have to hit.” But the OPCW deliberately dismissed this report from this engineer who said: “No, it is not possible that it was the Syrian army that did that.” It was already a false pretext in April 2018. It is not even a sub-team, it’s a team that was led by an engineer known in his field and perfectly competent and he was officially responsible for doing this investigation. It has been shown that these claims were false already before the leaks that just happened. In April 2018, the United States made false claims about the Syrian army using chemical weapons. It concluded that the on-site chlorine cylinders were more likely placed there by hand rather than having fallen from an aircraft, as indicated in the final report. What is really happening? A document from a sub-team of engineers working with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), involved in the assessment of the Duma chemical attack in April 2018, has recently been leaked. The evidence put forward seems to be weak, moreover, it contradicts the official version. The battle for Idlib is raging as Washington accuses Assad of using chemical weapons again. Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted Russia's military presence in Ukraine in 2015. ![]() According to the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), Russian special forces and troops operated to mobilise, lead, equip, and support separatist militias in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine from spring 2014 to the present, although their presence was denied by Moscow. NATO leaders also demanded that Russia comply with international law and its international obligations and responsibilities end its illegitimate occupation of Crimea refrain from aggressive actions against Ukraine halt the flow of weapons, equipment, people and money across the border to the separatists and stop fomenting tension along and across the Ukrainian border. The European Union stated in July 2014 that "arms and fighters continue flowing into Ukraine from the Russian Federation" At the NATO Summit in Wales in September 2014, NATO leaders condemned Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine in the strongest terms and demanded that Russia stop and withdraw its forces from Ukraine and along the country’s border. This international armed conflict began at the latest on 26 February 2014 when the Russian Federation deployed members of its armed forces to gain control over parts of the Ukrainian territory without the consent of the Ukrainian Government". The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has stated that “the information available suggests that the situation within the territory of Crimea and Sevastopol amounts to an international armed conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation. ![]() There is irrefutable evidence of direct Russian military involvement in eastern Ukraine. Recurring Kremlin narrative about the lack of evidence of the presence of Russian troops involved in war in the East of Ukraine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |